This is the classic case of the Indian family overshadowing and over protecting the kids.
The guy is 21 years old, he has no freedom to watch what he wants???
When guy has the right and duty to vote and select the government, he has the right to choose what he wants for himself which the family over shadows.
The strongest urge a human being has, is his sexual instinct. And when safe means to satisfy that urge (Watching Porn) is denied, I think you should face the consequences, which the grandmother did.
The grand mother has absolutely no right what so ever in reprimanding the 21 yr old in telling him what he should do.
The parents should be able to set the rules right after kids turn 18 that it is not their right to live at home any more. It is the parents that need to make it clear to their children that beyond 18, they are let to live at the parents as a perk and not their right, and that they need to compromise on whatever it takes for them to make the life of their parents more comfortable and not just them too.
I would blame it equally on the parents and the 21 yr old in case of this incident.
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Well all I can say is that if you think that the grandmother "deserved" it then you don’t deserve to live in a socially sound society as you think that killing someone is legitimate. I believe killing someone for any reason (except for heinous crimes like rape etc) is not correct. The very reason the so called 21 years adult chose to kill shows that he is just grown physically and not mentally. And this adult needs to be counselled just the way his grandmother tried to but faced dire consequences.
I do support your stance on kids staying with parents after 18 as not a right but a privilege but I am shocked that you are trying to say to say what the man did was right!
Cheers,
Amit
Post a Comment